Abstract
How far must an occupier guard against obvious risks that a rational visitor willingly takes for their own safety? How well is the post-Tomlinson trend against liability faring? Is the principle of volenti non fit injuria regaining popularity? A recent case looks at the competing themes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17-22 |
Journal | Travel Law Quarterly |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 12 Mar 2013 |