TY - JOUR
T1 - Uptake of best practice recommendations in the management of patients with diabetes and periodontitis
T2 - a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals in primary care
AU - Bissett, Susan M.
AU - Rapley, Tim
AU - Preshaw, Philip M.
AU - Presseau, Justin
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This research was funded by a UK National Institute for Health Research Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2014-07-023) awarded to SMB.
PY - 2020/1/30
Y1 - 2020/1/30
N2 - Objectives To investigate the practices of healthcare professionals in relation to best practice recommendations for the multidisciplinary management of people with diabetes and periodontitis, focusing on two clinical behaviours: informing patients about the links between diabetes and periodontitis, and suggesting patients with poorly controlled diabetes go for a dental check-up. Design Cross-sectional design utilising online questionnaires to assess self-reported performance and constructs from Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Normalisation Process Theory. Setting Primary care medical practices (n=37) in North East, North Cumbria and South West of England Clinical Research Networks. Participants 96 general practitioners (GPS), 48 nurses and 21 healthcare assistants (HCAs). Results Participants reported little to no informing patients about the links between diabetes and periodontitis or suggesting that they go for a dental check-up. Regarding future intent, both GPS (7.60±3.38) and nurses (7.94±3.69) scored significantly higher than HCAs (4.29±5.07) for SCT proximal goals (intention) in relation to informing patients about the links (p<0.01); and nurses (8.56±3.12) scored significantly higher than HCAs (5.14±5.04) for suggesting patients go for a dental check-up (p<0.001). All professional groups agreed on the potential value of both behaviours, and nurses scored significantly higher than GPS for legitimation (conforms to perception of job role) in relation to informing (nurses 4.16±0.71; GPS 3.77±0.76) and suggesting (nurses 4.13±0.66; GPS 3.75±0.83) (both p<0.01). The covariate background information (OR=2.81; p=0.03) was statistically significant for informing patients about the links. Conclusions Despite evidence-informed best practice recommendations, healthcare professionals currently report low levels of informing patients with diabetes about the links between diabetes and periodontitis and suggesting patients go for a dental check-up. However, healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, value these behaviours and consider them appropriate to their role. While knowledge of the evidence is important, future guidelines should consider different strategies to enable implementation of the delivery of healthcare interventions.
AB - Objectives To investigate the practices of healthcare professionals in relation to best practice recommendations for the multidisciplinary management of people with diabetes and periodontitis, focusing on two clinical behaviours: informing patients about the links between diabetes and periodontitis, and suggesting patients with poorly controlled diabetes go for a dental check-up. Design Cross-sectional design utilising online questionnaires to assess self-reported performance and constructs from Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Normalisation Process Theory. Setting Primary care medical practices (n=37) in North East, North Cumbria and South West of England Clinical Research Networks. Participants 96 general practitioners (GPS), 48 nurses and 21 healthcare assistants (HCAs). Results Participants reported little to no informing patients about the links between diabetes and periodontitis or suggesting that they go for a dental check-up. Regarding future intent, both GPS (7.60±3.38) and nurses (7.94±3.69) scored significantly higher than HCAs (4.29±5.07) for SCT proximal goals (intention) in relation to informing patients about the links (p<0.01); and nurses (8.56±3.12) scored significantly higher than HCAs (5.14±5.04) for suggesting patients go for a dental check-up (p<0.001). All professional groups agreed on the potential value of both behaviours, and nurses scored significantly higher than GPS for legitimation (conforms to perception of job role) in relation to informing (nurses 4.16±0.71; GPS 3.77±0.76) and suggesting (nurses 4.13±0.66; GPS 3.75±0.83) (both p<0.01). The covariate background information (OR=2.81; p=0.03) was statistically significant for informing patients about the links. Conclusions Despite evidence-informed best practice recommendations, healthcare professionals currently report low levels of informing patients with diabetes about the links between diabetes and periodontitis and suggesting patients go for a dental check-up. However, healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, value these behaviours and consider them appropriate to their role. While knowledge of the evidence is important, future guidelines should consider different strategies to enable implementation of the delivery of healthcare interventions.
KW - best practice
KW - clinical behaviours
KW - diabetes
KW - periodontitis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078854165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032369
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032369
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32005779
AN - SCOPUS:85078854165
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - 032369
ER -