TY - JOUR
T1 - Valence of agents and recipients moderates the side-effect effect
T2 - Two within-subjects, multi-item conceptual replications
AU - Stewart, Suzanne
AU - Kennedy, Bradley
AU - Haigh, Matthew
N1 - Funding information: The work was supported by funding from the University of Chester to the first author.
PY - 2022/2/17
Y1 - 2022/2/17
N2 - The side-effect effect (SEE) demonstrates that the valence of an unintended side effect influences intentionality judgements; people assess harmful (helpful) side effects as (un)intentional. Some evidence suggests that the SEE can be moderated by factors relating to the side effect’s causal agent and to its recipient. However, these findings are often derived from between-subjects studies with a single or few items, limiting generalisability. Our two within-subjects experiments utilised multiple items and successfully conceptually replicated these patterns of findings. Cumulative link mixed models showed the valence of both the agent and the recipient moderated intentionality and accountability ratings. This supports the view that people represent and consider multiple factors of a SEE scenario when judging intentionality. Importantly, it also demonstrates the applicability of multi-vignette, within-subjects approaches for generalising the effect to the wider population, within individuals, and to a multitude of potential scenarios. For open materials, data, and code, see https://www.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5MGKN.
AB - The side-effect effect (SEE) demonstrates that the valence of an unintended side effect influences intentionality judgements; people assess harmful (helpful) side effects as (un)intentional. Some evidence suggests that the SEE can be moderated by factors relating to the side effect’s causal agent and to its recipient. However, these findings are often derived from between-subjects studies with a single or few items, limiting generalisability. Our two within-subjects experiments utilised multiple items and successfully conceptually replicated these patterns of findings. Cumulative link mixed models showed the valence of both the agent and the recipient moderated intentionality and accountability ratings. This supports the view that people represent and consider multiple factors of a SEE scenario when judging intentionality. Importantly, it also demonstrates the applicability of multi-vignette, within-subjects approaches for generalising the effect to the wider population, within individuals, and to a multitude of potential scenarios. For open materials, data, and code, see https://www.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5MGKN.
KW - Intention
KW - Just World
KW - Knobe effect
KW - moral
KW - side effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113624955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2021.1971234
DO - 10.1080/20445911.2021.1971234
M3 - Article
SN - 2044-5911
VL - 34
SP - 289
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology
JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology
IS - 2
ER -