TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a complex needs indicator for veterans in the UK using a composite indicators’ method
AU - Fadeeva, Anastasiia
AU - Tomietto, Marco
AU - Tiwari, Ajay
AU - Mann, Emily
AU - Serra, Giuseppe
AU - Kiernan, Matthew
N1 - Funding information: This project was funded by the Armed Forces Covenant Fund Trust, grant number: CF-SG001.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Objective
To construct an indicator for assessing the complexity of UK veterans’ needs.
Study design
Cross-sectional, secondary analysis.
Methods
The study applied principal component (PCA) analysis as the method to determine the weights of different needs based on their interactions with each other, the effectiveness of the model was evaluated using bootstrapping. The dataset on UK veterans’ support provided by the “Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Associations” (SSAFA) (N = 35,208) was considered. The grant applications for different categories of support were used as indicators of different needs. The dimensions of breadth (number of different needs) and depth (number of grant applications to address the need) were incorporated in the assessment of complexity.
Results
The complex needs indicator for the current sample was validated. The majority of cases had a complexity score of 1 or less.
Conclusions
The research suggested and tested an assessment method for the complexity of veterans’ needs, that may be positively associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. This indicator can be used by decision-makers for risk stratification of the veteran population, thus supporting the allocation of resources in a more effective way.
AB - Objective
To construct an indicator for assessing the complexity of UK veterans’ needs.
Study design
Cross-sectional, secondary analysis.
Methods
The study applied principal component (PCA) analysis as the method to determine the weights of different needs based on their interactions with each other, the effectiveness of the model was evaluated using bootstrapping. The dataset on UK veterans’ support provided by the “Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Associations” (SSAFA) (N = 35,208) was considered. The grant applications for different categories of support were used as indicators of different needs. The dimensions of breadth (number of different needs) and depth (number of grant applications to address the need) were incorporated in the assessment of complexity.
Results
The complex needs indicator for the current sample was validated. The majority of cases had a complexity score of 1 or less.
Conclusions
The research suggested and tested an assessment method for the complexity of veterans’ needs, that may be positively associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. This indicator can be used by decision-makers for risk stratification of the veteran population, thus supporting the allocation of resources in a more effective way.
KW - Beneficiaries
KW - Complex needs
KW - Composite indicators
KW - Social care
KW - Veterans
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85181959158
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100464
DO - 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100464
M3 - Article
SN - 2666-5352
VL - 7
JO - Public Health in Practice
JF - Public Health in Practice
M1 - 100464
ER -