TY - JOUR
T1 - "Voluntary" user fees in Buenos Aires hospitals
T2 - Innovation or imposition?
AU - Lloyd-Sherlock, Peter
AU - Novick, Diego
PY - 2001/10/1
Y1 - 2001/10/1
N2 - Voluntary user fees in hospitals in Buenos Aires, which operate outside official controls, have not featured in other studies of health care in Argentina. After providing a historical overview of different hospital funding sources, the authors focus on the activity of cooperadoras-the organizations responsible for levying voluntary fees. Using detailed data from two case-study hospitals and more general financial sources, they assess the importance of these fees, identifying sharp variations between different hospitals, serious problems of under-reporting, and potential abuses. The authors also examine the means by which fees are levied and the degree of coercion involved. Voluntary fees are not a particularly successful funding strategy: the income they generate is variable; they are almost entirely unregulated; and they sometimes conflict with other, more legitimate funding sources. Most importantly, their voluntaristic aspect is largely notional: most patients are heavily pressured to make payments. The main motivation for continuing with voluntary fees is to avoid the political fallout that would probably result from introduction of a formal user fees policy.
AB - Voluntary user fees in hospitals in Buenos Aires, which operate outside official controls, have not featured in other studies of health care in Argentina. After providing a historical overview of different hospital funding sources, the authors focus on the activity of cooperadoras-the organizations responsible for levying voluntary fees. Using detailed data from two case-study hospitals and more general financial sources, they assess the importance of these fees, identifying sharp variations between different hospitals, serious problems of under-reporting, and potential abuses. The authors also examine the means by which fees are levied and the degree of coercion involved. Voluntary fees are not a particularly successful funding strategy: the income they generate is variable; they are almost entirely unregulated; and they sometimes conflict with other, more legitimate funding sources. Most importantly, their voluntaristic aspect is largely notional: most patients are heavily pressured to make payments. The main motivation for continuing with voluntary fees is to avoid the political fallout that would probably result from introduction of a formal user fees policy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035683287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2190/0AKN-3N3E-3C9K-V3G5
DO - 10.2190/0AKN-3N3E-3C9K-V3G5
M3 - Article
C2 - 11809006
AN - SCOPUS:0035683287
SN - 2755-1938
VL - 31
SP - 709
EP - 728
JO - International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services
JF - International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services
IS - 4
ER -