Watching you, watching me: Liability for voyeurism when the voyeur is also a participant in a private act

Tony Storey

doi:10.1177/0022018320929515

Watching you, watching me: Liability for voyeurism when the voyeur is also a participant in a private act

Tony Storey

Northumbria Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

193 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This case note analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 95, on the question whether a person can be convicted of voyeurism by filming a private act in which they are themselves one of the participants.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	259-262
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	84
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018320929515
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2020

Keywords

voyeurism
secret filming of ‘private act’ by participant in the act
reasonable expectation of privacy

Access to Document

10.1177/0022018320929515

Richards_2020_Accepted author manuscript, 114 KB

Cite this

@article{5df5a3efd6e1444ab1c90651c1859153,

title = "Watching you, watching me: Liability for voyeurism when the voyeur is also a participant in a private act",

abstract = "This case note analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 95, on the question whether a person can be convicted of voyeurism by filming a private act in which they are themselves one of the participants.",

keywords = "voyeurism, secret filming of {\textquoteleft}private act{\textquoteright} by participant in the act, reasonable expectation of privacy",

author = "Tony Storey",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0022018320929515",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "259--262",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "0022-0183",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Watching you, watching me: Liability for voyeurism when the voyeur is also a participant in a private act

AU - Storey, Tony

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - This case note analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 95, on the question whether a person can be convicted of voyeurism by filming a private act in which they are themselves one of the participants.

AB - This case note analyses the Court of Appeal's judgment in R v Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 95, on the question whether a person can be convicted of voyeurism by filming a private act in which they are themselves one of the participants.

KW - voyeurism

KW - secret filming of ‘private act’ by participant in the act

KW - reasonable expectation of privacy

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85132250613

U2 - 10.1177/0022018320929515

DO - 10.1177/0022018320929515

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-0183

VL - 84

SP - 259

EP - 262

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 3

ER -

Watching you, watching me: Liability for voyeurism when the voyeur is also a participant in a private act

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this