What could have been and may yet still be: Brexit, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to have rights

Adam Ramshaw

What could have been and may yet still be: Brexit, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to have rights

Adam Ramshaw

Law Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reflects on the potentially ongoing effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the UK following Brexit. Discusses UK approaches to the Charter, some potential misconceptions, the role of art.51, and the extent to which giving it a wide interpretation may lead to an inclusive application of the Charter involving the recognition of the "right to have rights".
Legislation cited
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union art.51

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	824-839
Journal	European Law Review
Volume	45
Issue number	6
Publication status	Published - 2 Dec 2020

Keywords

Brexit
EU law
Fundamental rights
Jurisprudence
Statutory interpretation

Access to Document

Charter Article Accepted DraftAccepted author manuscript, 92.3 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE2151AA0350311EB896ADCE34595958F/View/FullText.html

Cite this

@article{fde93320d1214e18982e99cea3b8d388,

title = "What could have been and may yet still be: Brexit, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to have rights ",

abstract = "Reflects on the potentially ongoing effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the UK following Brexit. Discusses UK approaches to the Charter, some potential misconceptions, the role of art.51, and the extent to which giving it a wide interpretation may lead to an inclusive application of the Charter involving the recognition of the {"}right to have rights{"}.Legislation citedCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union art.51",

keywords = "Brexit, EU law, Fundamental rights, Jurisprudence, Statutory interpretation",

author = "Adam Ramshaw",

note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Law Review following peer review. The definitive published version is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "2",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "824--839",

journal = "European Law Review",

issn = "0307-5400",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What could have been and may yet still be

T2 - Brexit, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to have rights

AU - Ramshaw, Adam

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in European Law Review following peer review. The definitive published version is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.

PY - 2020/12/2

Y1 - 2020/12/2

N2 - Reflects on the potentially ongoing effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the UK following Brexit. Discusses UK approaches to the Charter, some potential misconceptions, the role of art.51, and the extent to which giving it a wide interpretation may lead to an inclusive application of the Charter involving the recognition of the "right to have rights".Legislation citedCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union art.51

AB - Reflects on the potentially ongoing effects of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in the UK following Brexit. Discusses UK approaches to the Charter, some potential misconceptions, the role of art.51, and the extent to which giving it a wide interpretation may lead to an inclusive application of the Charter involving the recognition of the "right to have rights".Legislation citedCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union art.51

KW - Brexit

KW - EU law

KW - Fundamental rights

KW - Jurisprudence

KW - Statutory interpretation

M3 - Article

SN - 0307-5400

VL - 45

SP - 824

EP - 839

JO - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

IS - 6

ER -

What could have been and may yet still be: Brexit, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the right to have rights

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this