Abstract
The Washington Group Short Set (WG-SS) questions are increasingly integrated into national household surveys, censuses and international survey programs. They enable the monitoring of disability rights and the production of internationally comparable statistics. Disability statistics on prevalence and inequalities can be estimated using different cut-offs on the degree of functional difficulties based on the WG-SS. This commentary discusses what cut-offs to adopt for the purpose of investigating and monitoring disability gaps. We recommend a three-way disaggregation comparing persons with (a) no difficulty, (b) some difficulty and (c) a lot of difficulty or unable to do. In cases where sample sizes are small for disaggregated analysis, we recommend comparing persons with no difficulty to persons with any level of difficulty (i.e. persons with any disability).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101499 |
| Journal | Disability and Health Journal |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 29 Jun 2023 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Disparities
- Inequalities
- Measurement
- Washington Group Short Set
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What cut-off(s) to use with the Washington Group Short Set of Questions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver