Abstract
Sexualisation' has been dismissed by some as no more than yet another moral panic about youth and sex. However, it is striking that the term appears to have helped galvanise feminist activism, speaking in some way to the experiences of young people. Building from a history and analysis of the term, I propose that sexualisation' has served as an interpretive theory of contradictory gender norms, using the figure of the girl' to gesture towards an intensifying contradiction between the demands that young women display both desirability and innocence. In addressing sexist dimensions of gender norms through the figure of the girl', a minor, discourses on sexualisation can help circumvent liberal objections about free choice. However, I also express concern that the term has facilitated a focus in media and policy texts which attends less to gender inequity than to sexuality as a contaminant of young femininity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 255-264 |
| Journal | Feminist Theory |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3, SI |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- feminism
- girls
- identity politics
- sexualisation
- social policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What does sexualisation mean?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver