TY - JOUR
T1 - What does the UK public want farmland to look like?
AU - Rust, Niki A.
AU - Rehackova, Lucia
AU - Naab, Francis
AU - Abrams, Amber
AU - Hughes, Courtney
AU - Merkle, Bethann Garramon
AU - Clark, Beth
AU - Tindale, Sophie
N1 - Funding information: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Funding: This work was supported by Newcastle University via the N8 consortium of northern UK universities. The funder had no involvement in the study. Niki Rust is Programme Manager at the North Pennines AONB Partnership.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - As populations grow and demand for food rises, major shifts in global agri-food policy are likely to significantly impact agricultural land use. As the UK has now separated from the Common Agricultural Policy as it left the EU, Brexit offers a unique opportunity to create UK-specific agricultural policies that may dramatically shape both the countryside's appearance and the ecosystem services it provides. However, it is important to understand how the public – as taxpayers of agri-environment schemes – want the farmed countryside to look. To fill this knowledge gap, we undertook a novel mixed-methods study using a survey and collage-making workshops to understand aesthetic preferences for perceived “ideal” and “environmentally friendly” farm landscapes. Multinomial regression of data from a nationally representative survey of 2050 respondents demonstrated widespread support for agricultural landscapes containing trees and free-ranging livestock for ideal UK farm landscapes. Aesthetic preferences differed based on several socio-demographic variables, including gender, income and education. Landscapes with renewable energy technology, trees, and no livestock were perceived to be the most “environmentally friendly” farms, though wind turbines were visually unappealing. Eighty participants created collages of their ideal and environmentally friendly farming landscapes and completed a short survey to explain their choices. Qualitative thematic analysis of the collages and explanatory text found a desire for mosaic ideal farm landscapes focused either on agricultural or wild biological diversity. Results for the environmentally friendly farms reflected those in the survey. We discuss how our findings relate to implications for post-Brexit agricultural policy formation, particularly with regards to integrating public preferences around agri-food systems, to ensure tax-payers’ views are considered.
AB - As populations grow and demand for food rises, major shifts in global agri-food policy are likely to significantly impact agricultural land use. As the UK has now separated from the Common Agricultural Policy as it left the EU, Brexit offers a unique opportunity to create UK-specific agricultural policies that may dramatically shape both the countryside's appearance and the ecosystem services it provides. However, it is important to understand how the public – as taxpayers of agri-environment schemes – want the farmed countryside to look. To fill this knowledge gap, we undertook a novel mixed-methods study using a survey and collage-making workshops to understand aesthetic preferences for perceived “ideal” and “environmentally friendly” farm landscapes. Multinomial regression of data from a nationally representative survey of 2050 respondents demonstrated widespread support for agricultural landscapes containing trees and free-ranging livestock for ideal UK farm landscapes. Aesthetic preferences differed based on several socio-demographic variables, including gender, income and education. Landscapes with renewable energy technology, trees, and no livestock were perceived to be the most “environmentally friendly” farms, though wind turbines were visually unappealing. Eighty participants created collages of their ideal and environmentally friendly farming landscapes and completed a short survey to explain their choices. Qualitative thematic analysis of the collages and explanatory text found a desire for mosaic ideal farm landscapes focused either on agricultural or wild biological diversity. Results for the environmentally friendly farms reflected those in the survey. We discuss how our findings relate to implications for post-Brexit agricultural policy formation, particularly with regards to integrating public preferences around agri-food systems, to ensure tax-payers’ views are considered.
KW - Aesthetic preferences
KW - Agricultural policy
KW - Arts-based research
KW - Collage
KW - Cultural ecosystem services
KW - Landscape research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103969834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105445
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105445
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103969834
SN - 0264-8377
VL - 106
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
M1 - 105445
ER -