What Makes the Public Special? Political Philosophy, Methodology and Politically Motivated Research

Felix Bender*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Avner de Shalit argues that philosophers should listen to what the public thinks. He argues that by engaging with people in the streets, political philosophy will improve. Yet, what makes the public special in this regard? This response will do three things. First, it asks whether discussing with the public differs in any meaningful way from discussing with other people such as colleagues or students. Second, it questions the methodological approach, asking whether de Shalit's approach provides a legitimate answer to his question. Third, it raises the worry that this approach is prone to doing politics rather than philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-79
Number of pages5
JournalAustralasian Philosophical Review
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Political Philosophy
  • methodology
  • public opinion
  • politics
  • truth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Makes the Public Special? Political Philosophy, Methodology and Politically Motivated Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this