Abstract
Avner de Shalit argues that philosophers should listen to what the public thinks. He argues that by engaging with people in the streets, political philosophy will improve. Yet, what makes the public special in this regard? This response will do three things. First, it asks whether discussing with the public differs in any meaningful way from discussing with other people such as colleagues or students. Second, it questions the methodological approach, asking whether de Shalit's approach provides a legitimate answer to his question. Third, it raises the worry that this approach is prone to doing politics rather than philosophy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-79 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Australasian Philosophical Review |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Political Philosophy
- methodology
- public opinion
- politics
- truth