TY - JOUR
T1 - What Makes the Public Special? Political Philosophy, Methodology and Politically Motivated Research
AU - Bender, Felix
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Avner de Shalit argues that philosophers should listen to what the public thinks. He argues that by engaging with people in the streets, political philosophy will improve. Yet, what makes the public special in this regard? This response will do three things. First, it asks whether discussing with the public differs in any meaningful way from discussing with other people such as colleagues or students. Second, it questions the methodological approach, asking whether de Shalit's approach provides a legitimate answer to his question. Third, it raises the worry that this approach is prone to doing politics rather than philosophy.
AB - Avner de Shalit argues that philosophers should listen to what the public thinks. He argues that by engaging with people in the streets, political philosophy will improve. Yet, what makes the public special in this regard? This response will do three things. First, it asks whether discussing with the public differs in any meaningful way from discussing with other people such as colleagues or students. Second, it questions the methodological approach, asking whether de Shalit's approach provides a legitimate answer to his question. Third, it raises the worry that this approach is prone to doing politics rather than philosophy.
KW - Political Philosophy
KW - methodology
KW - public opinion
KW - politics
KW - truth
U2 - 10.1080/24740500.2021.1876418
DO - 10.1080/24740500.2021.1876418
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 2474-0519
VL - 4
SP - 75
EP - 79
JO - Australasian Philosophical Review
JF - Australasian Philosophical Review
IS - 1
ER -