What visual literacy is not!

Emma Jefferies, Jamie Steane

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper intends to help design educators reach a more informed understanding of visual literacy by stating what we already know it is not, in order to promote discussion on how it can be fostered. This paper is based on Jefferies’ PhD research from an empirical visual experiment carried out on a wide range of design practitioners, design students and the general public. Specific terms of influence such as ‘fixed’, ‘cross-disciplines’ and ‘accessibility’ were highlighted for discussion when considering what visual literacy is not, and were consequently used to frame the problem. When considering each of these influences in terms of seeing; (a) Viewing visual language as a ‘fixed’ vocabulary does not allow for each working context to have its own visual value system. (b) Literacy of ‘cross-disciplines’ may not enable a way of seeing to be transferred between each design discipline. (c) ‘Accessibility’ in terms of a student’s ability to read or write an image can not be determined from a designer’s final product, as each individual and context is different. It is proposed that debating the three identified areas will heighten design educators’ awareness and provide a valuable basis for future pedagogy practices.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventConnectED 2007: International Conference on Design Education - The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Duration: 9 Jul 200712 Jul 2007

Conference

ConferenceConnectED 2007
CountryAustralia
CitySydney
Period9/07/0712/07/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What visual literacy is not!'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this