What’s the point of co-production when all your participants agree with you?

Matthew Johnson; Elliott Johnson; Irene Hardill; Daniel Nettle

What’s the point of co-production when all your participants agree with you?

Matthew Johnson, Elliott Johnson, Irene Hardill, Daniel Nettle

School of Communities and Education

Research output: Other contribution

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Does all policy research benefit from co-production? Matthew Johnson, Elliott Johnson, Irene Hardill and Daniel Nettle argue that the key benefits co-production for policymaking lie not in areas of high consensus, but in honing material arguments and narratives that can shift the boundaries policymaking.

Original language	English
Type	Blog post
Media of output	Online
Publisher	LSE
Number of pages	1
Place of Publication	London
Publication status	Published - 11 Mar 2024

Publication series

Name	Impact of Social Sciences
Publisher	LSE

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 1 No Poverty
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Access to Document

LSEimpact_Johnson_et_al_v2Accepted author manuscript, 165 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/03/11/whats-the-point-of-co-production-when-all-your-participants-agree-with-you/Licence: CC BY-NC

3 Article
1 Commissioned report
1 Featured article

Breaking the Overton Window: on the need for adversarial co-production
Johnson, E. A., Hardill, I., Johnson, M. & Nettle, D., 1 Aug 2024, In: Evidence and Policy. 20, 3, p. 393–405 13 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
13 Citations (Scopus)

128 Downloads (Pure)
Can the ‘downward spiral’ of material conditions, mental health and faith in government be stopped? Evidence from surveys in ‘red wall’ constituencies
Johnson, M. T., Johnson, E. A., Reed, H. & Nettle, D., 1 Feb 2024, In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 26, 1, p. 131-148 18 p., 136914812211468.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
17 Citations (Scopus)

154 Downloads (Pure)
Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income
Johnson, M., Johnson, E. & Nettle, D., 1 Mar 2023, In: British Politics. 18, 1, p. 104–127 24 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
21 Citations (Scopus)

136 Downloads (Pure)

Basic Income: changing policy, designing trials, evaluating impact
Johnson, M. (Participant), Johnson, E. A. (Participant), Stark, G. (Participant), Reed, H. (Participant) & Nettle, D. (Participant)
Impact: Health and welfare

Cite this

@misc{81d50ccc673a4626b448077aefc00869,

title = "What{\textquoteright}s the point of co-production when all your participants agree with you?",

abstract = "Does all policy research benefit from co-production? Matthew Johnson, Elliott Johnson, Irene Hardill and Daniel Nettle argue that the key benefits co-production for policymaking lie not in areas of high consensus, but in honing material arguments and narratives that can shift the boundaries policymaking.",

author = "Matthew Johnson and Elliott Johnson and Irene Hardill and Daniel Nettle",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

day = "11",

language = "English",

series = "Impact of Social Sciences",

publisher = "LSE",