Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When faecal sludge reuse doesn’t work: a look at access for the poorest and people with disabilities in urban Malawi

Adrian Mallory, Martin Crapper, Rochelle Holm

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

    72 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Reusing faecal sludge to generate value has the potential to contribute towards solving the issue of long term sanitation solutions in cities across Sub-Saharan Africa. This research was conducted to evaluate the potential for faecal sludge reuse in Malawi, and the difficulties and challenges to existing attempts at reuse in a city. We conducted 65 semi-structured interviews in a city of Malawi. The results show that two main approaches exist currently: The implementation of Skyloos as above ground household toilets which provide compost; and a central disposal site from which compost is illegally harvested. Both existing approaches to faecal sludge management and reuse were found to be inaccessible and not working when implemented for the poorest and people with disabilities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages6
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2018
    Event41st WEDC International Conference: Transformation Towards Sustainable and Resilient Wash Services - Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya
    Duration: 9 Jul 201813 Jul 2018
    https://wedc-knowledge.lboro.ac.uk/conference/41/index.html

    Conference

    Conference41st WEDC International Conference
    Abbreviated titleWEDC 41
    Country/TerritoryKenya
    CityNakuru
    Period9/07/1813/07/18
    Internet address

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When faecal sludge reuse doesn’t work: a look at access for the poorest and people with disabilities in urban Malawi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this