Abstract
Design’s expanding presence in policy has generated multiple expressions of its value and impact, yet few address the political and strategic dimensions of policymaking. This paper examines how co-design operates within these dynamics by navigating frame conflicts during policy problem-setting and policy options modelling. Drawing on Schön and Rein’s theory of Frame Reflection, we analyse how institutional framings of policy issues collide with those held by communities, and how co-design practices surface, negotiate, and reconfigure these conflicts. Through two English case studies: 1) School Food Systems and 2) Breakfast Clubs, we show how co-design reveals divergent interpretations of public problems and enables collaborative reframing toward implementable clumsy solutions. The findings highlight codesign’s under-recognised capacity to make frames visible and negotiable in policy contexts. This practice of participatory frame navigation furthers our understanding of design’s contribution in policy-making contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-23 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Proceedings of DRS |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 25 Feb 2026 |
| Event | DRS2026 - University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Duration: 8 Jun 2026 → 12 Jun 2026 https://drs2026.thedrs.org/home |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- policymaking
- co-design
- frame reflection
- policy disputes
Research Group keywords
- Responsible Innovation Hub: ReIn (incorporating Responsible Design Innovation research group and Northumbria Design-led social Innovation (nDESIS) Lab)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When frames collide: Participatory frame navigation through co-design in policy contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver