Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)
64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accounts of hydro-hegemony and counter hydro-hegemony provide state-based conceptions of power in international river basins. However, authority should be seen as transnationalized as small states develop coping strategies to augment their authority over decision-making processes. The article engages Rosenau’s spheres of authority concept to argue that hydro-hegemony is exercised by actors embedded in spheres of authority that reshape actor configurations as they emerge. These spheres consist of complex networks challenging customary notions of the local-global dichotomy and hydro-hegemony. Hydro-hegemony is therefore not fixed. The article examines these processes by analysing the dispute over the Xayaburi Dam in the Mekong Basin.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)911-928
JournalWater International
Volume40
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2015

Keywords

  • water governance
  • hydropower
  • scales
  • transnational authority
  • water-energy nexus
  • Mekong

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this