Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    62 Citations (Scopus)
    105 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Accounts of hydro-hegemony and counter hydro-hegemony provide state-based conceptions of power in international river basins. However, authority should be seen as transnationalized as small states develop coping strategies to augment their authority over decision-making processes. The article engages Rosenau’s spheres of authority concept to argue that hydro-hegemony is exercised by actors embedded in spheres of authority that reshape actor configurations as they emerge. These spheres consist of complex networks challenging customary notions of the local-global dichotomy and hydro-hegemony. Hydro-hegemony is therefore not fixed. The article examines these processes by analysing the dispute over the Xayaburi Dam in the Mekong Basin.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)911-928
    JournalWater International
    Volume40
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2015

    Keywords

    • water governance
    • hydropower
    • scales
    • transnational authority
    • water-energy nexus
    • Mekong

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this