Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    62 Citations (Scopus)
    144 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Accounts of hydro-hegemony and counter hydro-hegemony provide state-based conceptions of power in international river basins. However, authority should be seen as transnationalized as small states develop coping strategies to augment their authority over decision-making processes. The article engages Rosenau’s spheres of authority concept to argue that hydro-hegemony is exercised by actors embedded in spheres of authority that reshape actor configurations as they emerge. These spheres consist of complex networks challenging customary notions of the local-global dichotomy and hydro-hegemony. Hydro-hegemony is therefore not fixed. The article examines these processes by analysing the dispute over the Xayaburi Dam in the Mekong Basin.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)911-928
    JournalWater International
    Volume40
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
      SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
    2. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • water governance
    • hydropower
    • scales
    • transnational authority
    • water-energy nexus
    • Mekong

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Where Is the Power? Transnational Networks, Authority and the Dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this