TY - JOUR
T1 - Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects
AU - Baldock, Katherine C.R.
AU - Goddard, Mark A.
AU - Hicks, Damien M.
AU - Kunin, William E.
AU - Mitschunas, Nadine
AU - Osgathorpe, Lynne M.
AU - Potts, Simon G.
AU - Robertson, Kirsty M.
AU - Scott, Anna V.
AU - Stone, Graham N.
AU - Vaughan, Ian P.
AU - Memmott, Jane
PY - 2015/3/22
Y1 - 2015/3/22
N2 - Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.
AB - Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.
KW - Networks
KW - Pollinators
KW - Urban
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922566883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849
M3 - Article
C2 - 25673686
AN - SCOPUS:84922566883
SN - 0962-8452
VL - 282
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1803
M1 - 20142849
ER -