Whether ‘obvious and serious’ risk of death in cases of gross negligence manslaughter to be determined both objectively and prospectively: R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168

Tony Storey

doi:10.1177/0022018317733838

Whether ‘obvious and serious’ risk of death in cases of gross negligence manslaughter to be determined both objectively and prospectively: R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168

Tony Storey

Law Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

1 Citation (Scopus)

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This case note analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168, on the meaning of the requirement in gross negligence manslaughter that the risk of death arising from the defendant's breach of duty must be both "obvious" and "serious"

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	343-346
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Journal of Criminal Law
Volume	81
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018317733838
Publication status	Published - 12 Oct 2017

Keywords

Gross negligence manslaughter
‘obvious and serious’ risk of death

Access to Document

10.1177/0022018317733838

Storey - ‘obvious and serious’ risk of deathAccepted author manuscript, 19.9 KB

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022018317733838

Cite this

@article{7cdc1014414a481395cdef23e621bb0f,

title = "Whether {\textquoteleft}obvious and serious{\textquoteright} risk of death in cases of gross negligence manslaughter to be determined both objectively and prospectively: R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168",

abstract = "This case note analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168, on the meaning of the requirement in gross negligence manslaughter that the risk of death arising from the defendant's breach of duty must be both {"}obvious{"} and {"}serious{"}",

keywords = "Gross negligence manslaughter, {\textquoteleft}obvious and serious{\textquoteright} risk of death",

author = "Tony Storey",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1177/0022018317733838",

language = "English",

volume = "81",

pages = "343--346",

journal = "The Journal of Criminal Law",

issn = "0022-0183",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whether ‘obvious and serious’ risk of death in cases of gross negligence manslaughter to be determined both objectively and prospectively

T2 - R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168

AU - Storey, Tony

PY - 2017/10/12

Y1 - 2017/10/12

N2 - This case note analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168, on the meaning of the requirement in gross negligence manslaughter that the risk of death arising from the defendant's breach of duty must be both "obvious" and "serious"

AB - This case note analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168, on the meaning of the requirement in gross negligence manslaughter that the risk of death arising from the defendant's breach of duty must be both "obvious" and "serious"

KW - Gross negligence manslaughter

KW - ‘obvious and serious’ risk of death

U2 - 10.1177/0022018317733838

DO - 10.1177/0022018317733838

M3 - Article

SN - 0022-0183

VL - 81

SP - 343

EP - 346

JO - The Journal of Criminal Law

JF - The Journal of Criminal Law

IS - 5

ER -

Whether ‘obvious and serious’ risk of death in cases of gross negligence manslaughter to be determined both objectively and prospectively: R v Rose [2017] EWCA Crim 1168

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this