Which is a better proxy, site period or depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the average shear‑wave velocity?

Chuanbin Zhu; Marco Pilz; Fabrice Cotton

doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6

Which is a better proxy, site period or depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the average shear‑wave velocity?

Chuanbin Zhu^*, Marco Pilz, Fabrice Cotton

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6
Publication status	Published - 2020
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6

Cite this

@article{b09b1316f48548a8a02ad23057eb2d79,

title = "Which is a better proxy, site period or depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the average shear‑wave velocity?",

author = "Chuanbin Zhu and Marco Pilz and Fabrice Cotton",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6",

language = "English",

journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering",