Abstract
Among women opposing expansion of mining operations in Cajamarca, Peru, narratives of preferred alternatives diverge: from sustainable mining to alternative economic development, to more radical alternatives to ‘development’. In these accounts, both the women's relative powerlessness and agency become apparent. This article critically explores women's views of development and their imaginings of their region with or without mining. I argue that those who opposed mining show a continuing engagement with questions of development in the aftermath of conflict over natural resource extraction, highlighting a common thread of desires for bottom-up initiatives embracing local knowledge, practice and history.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 188-203 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Bulletin of Latin American Research |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 16 Sept 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Andes
- Latin America
- development
- extractivism
- mining
- women
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Whose Development? How Women Living Near the Yanacocha Mine, Peru, Envision Potential Futures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver