TY - JOUR
T1 - Why are mobile phones annoying?
AU - Monk, Andrew
AU - Carroll, Jenni
AU - Parker, Sarah
AU - Blythe, Mark
N1 - Funding information: Monk and Blythe were supported by the UK EPSRC during the period of this work. We would also like to thank Virgin Trains for their part in making the study possible. Thanks are also due to Gordon Baxter and David Grayson, for their help with previous versions of this paper.
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - Sixty four members of the public were exposed to the same staged conversation either while waiting in a bus station or travelling on a train. Half of the conversations were by mobile phone, so that only one end of the conversation was heard, and half were co present face-to-face, conversations. The volume of the conversations was controlled at one of two levels: the actors' usual speech level and exaggeratedly loud. Following exposure to the conversation participants were approached and asked to give verbal ratings on six scales. Analysis of variance showed that mobile phone conversations were significantly more noticeable and annoying than face-to-face conversations at the same volume when the content of the conversation is controlled. Indeed this effect of medium was as large as the effect of loudness. Various explanations of this effect are explored, with their practical implications.
AB - Sixty four members of the public were exposed to the same staged conversation either while waiting in a bus station or travelling on a train. Half of the conversations were by mobile phone, so that only one end of the conversation was heard, and half were co present face-to-face, conversations. The volume of the conversations was controlled at one of two levels: the actors' usual speech level and exaggeratedly loud. Following exposure to the conversation participants were approached and asked to give verbal ratings on six scales. Analysis of variance showed that mobile phone conversations were significantly more noticeable and annoying than face-to-face conversations at the same volume when the content of the conversation is controlled. Indeed this effect of medium was as large as the effect of loudness. Various explanations of this effect are explored, with their practical implications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0942300936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01449290310001638496
DO - 10.1080/01449290310001638496
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0942300936
VL - 23
SP - 33
EP - 41
JO - Behaviour and Information Technology
JF - Behaviour and Information Technology
SN - 0144-929X
IS - 1
ER -