Work disengagement: A review of the literature

Bahar Afrahi*, John Blenkinsopp, Juan Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, Mohammed Shamsul Karim

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Abstract

Engagement with work has been one of the most influential management ideas of recent decades. A prevalent assumption is that engagement is inherently beneficial and disengagement is a problem to be addressed. Yet theory and research on disengagement show it may not have the assumed negative impact on organizations, and at times may be beneficial for employees. This research seeks to unpack the underlying assumptions of work disengagement through collating and reviewing studies of the phenomenon. The paper makes three contributions. First, it provides a clear argument for why disengagement is a concept worth studying in its own right, as a functional coping response. Second, it offers a typology of the antecedents that applies to current theoretical frameworks. Third, it suggests differentiating between engaged, not engaged, and disengaged to address various levels of dedication to work domains and provide a basis for more evidence-based HR interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100822
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Early online date15 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Feb 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Work disengagement: A review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this