Work disengagement: A review of the literature

Bahar Afrahi*, John Blenkinsopp, Juan Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, Mohammed Shamsul Karim

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

    74 Citations (Scopus)
    178 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Engagement with work has been one of the most influential management ideas of recent decades. A prevalent assumption is that engagement is inherently beneficial and disengagement is a problem to be addressed. Yet theory and research on disengagement show it may not have the assumed negative impact on organizations, and at times may be beneficial for employees. This research seeks to unpack the underlying assumptions of work disengagement through collating and reviewing studies of the phenomenon. The paper makes three contributions. First, it provides a clear argument for why disengagement is a concept worth studying in its own right, as a functional coping response. Second, it offers a typology of the antecedents that applies to current theoretical frameworks. Third, it suggests differentiating between engaged, not engaged, and disengaged to address various levels of dedication to work domains and provide a basis for more evidence-based HR interventions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number100822
    Number of pages16
    JournalHuman Resource Management Review
    Volume32
    Issue number2
    Early online date9 Mar 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

    Keywords

    • Antecedents
    • Outcomes
    • Resources and demands
    • Systematic literature review
    • Work disengagement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Work disengagement: A review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this