Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking

Anna Chrabaszcz*, Anna Laurinavichyute, Nina Ladinskaya, Liubov Baladzhaeva, Anat Prior, Andriy Myachykov, Olga Dragoy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study tests the hypothesis that the directionality of reading habits (left-to-right or right-to-left) impacts individuals’ representation of nonspatial events. Using the blank screen paradigm, we examine whether eye movements reflect culture-specific spatial biases in processing temporal information, specifically, grammatical tense in Russian and Hebrew. Sixty-two native speakers of Russian (a language with a left-to-right reading and writing system) and 62 native speakers of Hebrew (a language with a right-to-left reading and writing system) listened to verbs in the past or future tense while their spontaneous gaze positions were recorded. Following the verb, a visual spatial probe appeared in one of the five locations of the screen, and participants responded manually to indicate its position. While participants’ response latencies to the spatial probe revealed no significant effects, their gaze positions along the horizontal axis for past- and future-tensed verbs aligned with the reading and writing direction in their language. These results provide novel evidence that eye movements during auditory processing of grammatical tense are influenced by culturally specific reading and writing conventions, shifting leftward or rightward on the horizontal plane depending on the stimuli’s time reference (past or future) and the participants’ language (Russian or Hebrew). This spatial bias indicates a common underlying cognitive mechanism that uses spatial dimensions to represent temporal constructs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalMemory and Cognition
Early online date3 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • Eye movements
  • Grammatical tense
  • Ocular drift
  • Reading–writing habits hypothesis
  • Space–time congruency

Cite this