Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Zemiology and Decoloniality: Panoptification of Victimhood and Epistemic Violence in Anti-trafficking Reporting

Georgios Papanicolaou, Eleni Dimou, Boukli Avi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Zemiology is an evolving critical perspective that focuses on understanding and responding to social harm, particularly the ‘lawful but awful’ acts and/or omissions by powerful actors such as states, both locally and globally (e.g., Hillyard et al., 2004). Therefore, it challenges the doxas of mainstream criminology, which hold that legally defined crimes depict and address the most serious harms in each society. Zemiology underscores the socially constructed nature of ‘crime’, pointing to the importance of discourse and knowledge production in shaping public perceptions, reinforcing and reflecting power structures, dominant ideologies, and political interests, rather than an objective assessment of harm (see Copson et al., 2025). As such, zemiology explores both criminalised and non-criminalised harms with a particular focus on state and corporate power in legitimising, recognising, silencing, or ignoring particular harms.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationZemiology Beyond the Critique of Capitalism: Harm, Colonialism and Decolonisation
EditorsEdward J. Wright, James Heydon, George C. Dertadian
Place of PublicationLondon, United Kingdom
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter3
Pages44-59
Number of pages16
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781003603245
ISBN (Print)9781032992709, 9781032992723
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jun 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Coloniality
  • Zemiology
  • Human trafficking
  • epistemic violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zemiology and Decoloniality: Panoptification of Victimhood and Epistemic Violence in Anti-trafficking Reporting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this